QUARKS AND LEPTONS: An Introductory Course in Modem Particle Physics. Francis Halzen. University of Wisconsin. Madison, Wisconsin. Alan D. Martin. Halzen, Martin: Quarks and Leptons; Wiley Griffiths: Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics; Wiley Perkins: Introduction to High. Halzen, F.; Martin, Alan D. Quarks And Leptons: An Introductory Course In Modern Particle Physics. F. Halzen (Wisconsin U., Madison), Alan.
|Published (Last):||6 January 2006|
|PDF File Size:||17.89 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Quarks and Leptones: An Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics
In this regard, Griffith’s Introduction to Elementary particlesI think, uses a clearer notation. I ask this because it is not clear from their notation.
Fall – Elementary Particle Physics
Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Do Halzen and Martin use p and n to represent complex numbers? SRS 6, 4 31 Not quantum fields, but rather particles.
I’ve edited to clarify this a bit. I wrote ” or really, their corresponding fields ” to acknowledge that particles cannot truly mix, only fields can mix.
QUARKS AND LEPTONS: AN INTRODUCTORY COURSE IN MODERN PARTICLE PHYSICS – INSPIRE-HEP
My point in the second paragraph is that the p and n in the doublet are not mathematical variables. I’m trying to avoid saying that they are fields because a field is a variable that can be assigned a number or spinor or some such thing; that’s not what I’m getting at here. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.
Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.
Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.